Volume 2, No.
Jihad in
Vinod Kumar
Ever since the attacks on the
Writing recently in The Hindu,
Brig. (Retd.) Sarathy in his attempt
to portray a balanced picture of Jihad missed some key points.
http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/op/2003/01/14/stories/2003011400060200.htm
Quoting three verses (2 ;190, 191
and 193) of the Koran, Sarathy wrote "a reading
of the above three verses together, may be interpreted to mean that the
underlying spirit is to curb and eradicate "oppression."
These verses were from the Meccan
era , when the Prophet was weak and recommended soft
solutions but after migrating to
Sheikh Abdullah bin Muhammad bin Hamid,
of Sacred Mosque of Mecca explains in introductory essay in Sahih al-Bukhari:
Then Allah revealed in Sura Bara'at (Repentance, IX) to discard (all) the obligations
(covenants, etc.) and commanded the Muslims to fight against all the
pagans as well as the people of the scriptures (Jews and Christians) if
they do not embrace Islam, till they pay the Jizya (A
tax levied on the Jews and Christians who do not embrace Islam and are
under the protection of an Islamic government) with willing submission and feel
themselves subdued (as is revealed in the verse 9:29)."
He goes on to say at first the fighting was forbidden,
then it was permitted and after that it was made obligatory. Against
whom? He explains.
1. Against those who start "the fighting"
against Muslims
2. And against all those who worship others along with
Allah as mentioned in Sura Al-Baqra(II), Al-Imran (
Jihad is urged not only against those who start
"fighting" against the Muslims but anyone who worships others along
with Allah. and does not accept Muhammad as His
prophet.
He repeats - Allah made "the fighting" (jihad)
obligatory for the Muslims and gave importance to the subject matter of jihad
in all the Suras which were revealed (at
"March forth whether you are light (being healthy, young
and wealthy), or heavy (being ill, old and poor) and strive hard with your
wealth and your lives in the cause of Allah. That is better for you if but you
knew." (
"Pakistan's efforts to project "Kashmir" in
a similar manner as a fit cause for fighting "oppression by Indian
state" have not drawn as much response" -- Sarathy
went on to write. Firstly there is no "oppression" by the Indian
state in
As far as Jihad being sustainable in
"They (the idolaters and polytheists) are to be
fought till they submit to and accept Islam. The Prophet says:
'I am commended to fight with the polytheists till they
testify there is god but Allah, and that Muhammad is His servant and His
apostle, face out qibla, eat what we slaughter, and
pray like us.'" (Sunnan Abu Dawud,
vol II, pp. 729-30. Quoted from The
World of Fatwas by Arun Shourie,
pp. 576)
"Idolatry is worse than carnage" the Koran
declares. (Koran 2:217)
Allah exhorts the believers "when the sacred months
are over slay the idolaters wherever you find
them" (Koran 9:5) and "make war upon them until idolatry shall cease
and God's religion shall reign supreme." (Koran 2 ;193,
There is no need for a government or any other body to
declare Jihad against the unbelievers. It is the duty of every believer to
fight in Allah's cause with everything at his disposal. (Koran 9:41) Of course,
when an Islamic government declares Jihad, then it is the duty of every Muslim
to respond to it. (Sahih Al-Bukhari,
vol. 4, pp. 35)
The rewards that accrue from Jihad are profound - the
booty in this world if one survives and paradise in the next if one becomes a
martyr. (Bukhari, vol. 4, pp. 38)
We have all seen on television, how parents (in
A day spent in Jihad for Allah's cause is better than the
world and whatsoever is in it, such is the superiority of Jihad. (Sahih Al-Bukhari, vol. 4, pp. 41)
and there is no possible deed that equals jihad (Sahih
Al-Bukhari, vol. 4, pp. 36).
The condition for waging Jihad against the unbelievers is
to first invite them to accept Islam before declaring war. (Sahih
Al-Bukhari, vol. 4, pp. 116)
It is true that not every Muslim is engaged in Jihad. It
is true not only today; it was true during the time of Prophet Muhammad
also. Those who did not were called hypocrites and their fidelity to
Islam was in question.
And if Jihad, indeed, is "mental struggle against passion" - it is welcome, I am sure, by all non-Muslims. What a non-Muslim is primarily interested in is Jihad that affects his (non-Muslim's) survival.